Blog

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

PHH Mortgage Fraud

Because Attorney Jason McGrath and this law firm handle foreclosure and mortgage dispute cases on a daily basis, we are well familiar with some of the crazy circumstances which one may encounter when dealing with the big banks and large loan servicers. In this video, Mr. McGrath discusses how the federal government’s lawsuit against PHH Mortgage may be impacting that entity’s ability to handle its business, including its distressed mortgage cases.



https://youtu.be/AJTYGhYNdZw

 

Friday, September 18, 2015

Post-Foreclosure Deficiency Judgments in NC

Because of his extensive work in the area of foreclosures and post-foreclosure lawsuits, Attorney Jason McGrath is frequently asked about whether a foreclosing party/creditor (such as the lender, loan note holder, etc.) will be able to collect money from the borrowers after foreclosure occurs. In this video, which is specifically geared toward such circumstances in North Carolina, Mr. McGrath explains how a recent court decision may impact post-foreclosure deficiency judgment lawsuits in North Carolina.



https://youtu.be/xL-vJ3n7BYw

post-foreclosure

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) – What is the Borrower Really Paying for?

Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) – What is the Borrower Really Paying for?



As attorneys who provide a variety of real estate and mortgage related services, including real estate closings and handling real estate disputes, we know that many (most?) borrowers really don’t understand private mortgage insurance. Known as PMI, private mortgage insurance is to benefit the lender, not the borrower – even though the borrower is paying for it.



We’ve advised borrowers about this in various contexts, including when a mortgage insurance company sues the borrower to recover monies the insurance company paid out pursuant to the policy. For more about mortgage insurance companies suing borrowers, including in post-foreclosure situations, click here.



PMI is typically required if the circumstances include a private mortgage loan in which less than 20% of the sales price / appraised value is put down up front. From the lender standpoint, PMI is a very good thing – the borrower has to pay for an insurance policy which names the lender as the beneficiary, with the lender (or whomever ends up owning the loan) potentially being able to make a claim on the policy if the borrower defaults on the loan, and that default results in the lender not being paid back in full.



In most situations, the premium payments the borrower has to make for private mortgage insurance are rolled into the borrower’s monthly “mortgage payment”. The details regarding the original PMI agreement, including the payment amount, are known in advance of the real estate closing. Borrowers / buyers should be asking questions about PMI before closing as compared to after (although better to ask afterwards and know than to not ask at all).



It’s also extremely important to know when you might be able to cancel your PMI – and the related payments, thus decreasing your monthly payment by hundreds of dollars. This sentence will link to our blog on canceling PMI once that is published in the near future; you should subscribe to our blog (see the upper right side of this page to do so) if you’d like to receive that update.  



We encourage all of our real estate clients to be or become informed ones, and we assist in that process. After all, knowledge is power.

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Mediation

Whether mediation is court ordered, required by some prior contract/agreement, or occurs as a result of parties to a lawsuit agreeing to mediate, mediation is often an excellent opportunity to resolve a lawsuit. In his 19 years as trial lawyer, Jason McGrath has mediated many cases and in this video he explains how mediation works.



https://youtu.be/TiNYEiqgB4Y

If you are facing a lawsuit in North Carolina please fill out our confidential client intake form for legal assistance.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Being Sued by a Mortgage Insurance Company for an Insurance Policy you Paid for?

Being Sued by a Mortgage Insurance Company for an Insurance Policy you Paid for?



As attorneys who provide a variety of real estate and mortgage related services, including foreclosures and post-foreclosure disputes, we know that many (most?) borrowers really don’t understand private mortgage insurance. Known as PMI, private mortgage insurance is to benefit the lender, not the borrower – even though the borrower is paying for it.



What makes it worse from the borrower’s perspective is that, in addition to being foreclosed on, a borrower can end up being sued by the mortgage insurance company in relation to the very same policy the borrower paid for. The highly technical terms we use to describe this include:



[caption id="attachment_9288" align="alignleft" width="130"]The Gut Punch The Gut Punch[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_9289" align="alignleft" width="110"]Getting Hit Below the Belt Getting Hit Below the Belt[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_9287" align="alignleft" width="130"]The Double Whammy The Double Whammy[/caption]

 

 

 

 

 

 

We’ve advised and defended borrowers in these cases. The most common fact scenario is this one:




  1. a foreclosure takes place (or sometimes even a short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure);

  2. the loan is not paid off in full;

  3. the creditor (lender / loan note holder) makes a claim against the private mortgage insurance policy;

  4. the mortgage insurance company pays the creditor to reimburse it for its losses on the loan;

  5. the mortgage insurance company sues the borrower / former homeowner, under the theory of “We only had to pay out on this policy because you didn’t pay the loan off in full, so you owe us”; and

  6. the borrower is shocked, comes to us for help.



We’ve seen cases in which the mortgage insurance company may not actually have paid out the money it was seeking to recover, in which the mortgage insurance company was unable to even produce the insurance policy at issue, and in which the borrower has been assured by the persons involved in the deal (before our involvement) that the borrower was going to be “free and clear” after a foreclosure, short sale, or deed-in-lieu. However, we’ve also seen cases in which the borrower did appear to legally owe the monies being sought by the insurance company.



These cases usually – in our experience and based on our assistance – go away without the borrower having to pay what the mortgage insurance company is seeking. However, each case and each client is different, and no guarantees or predictions can be made. The bottom line is that anyone wanting to reach a settlement with the lender / note holder before the property is disposed of and anyone who has been notified of a claim against them related to PMI should be educated and informed and perhaps seek professional assistance.